• andrewta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    So which piece of technology or piece of science did you use to absolutely prove that there is no afterlife?

    • dandi8@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Which did you use to prove there is? What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.

      • andrewta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        The problem is there is no way to prove there is or isn’t an after life. My point is that he’s acting like it’s already been proven.

        • dandi8@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          If I tell you I’m your god and you should give me all your money or you won’t go to heaven, you will rightly call me a liar, even though you can’t really prove that I’m not.

          You won’t say “oh I guess there’s no way to prove he’s not god, so I’d better give him my money”.

          In science, the default stance on something existing is that it doesn’t, unless there’s solid proof, or at least a compelling scientific theory suggesting that it does.

        • B0rax@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          He is not explicitly saying there is no afterlife, just that there is no way to communicate with a potential afterlife.