Surprised they didn’t watch Luther.

Monk maybe of their taste, considering mentalist and poirot.

Super mega…sons of bitches

People call this “voting with your money”

Can anyone just fill a complain?

I have a feeling we don’t do enough.

It must be something to protest legally as a hidden fee or something. I would put money in a crowdfunding for cases like this.

Citizens against apathy or something.

K, just did my part gonna keep lingering.

It’s funny in comic. Not so much in real life: https://youtu.be/lefmaNO1D9w?t=1m5s

Do you know why dogs licks their own genitals?

Because they can.

Fair trade if you ask me.

This is kind of what I was pointing at. Maybe I didn’t word my post well. English is not my mother tongue.

“You are doing the fucking boomer shit that kids are too sensitive these days”

You are an impolite person talking like that. I didn’t say anything about kids and know kids these days that are more balanced than many old people. I’m millenial, BTW.

“Be a tough guy”

I’ll be whatever I want, thx. Go tell some people to be what you like. Surely you sound tough with all that big words.

Emotional impact.

I too prefer non toxic interactions, but also try to not build and echo chamber.

I answered to another post.

I don’t know why everyone assumed I was chosing a side.

Actually I was trying to make a blank statement. I agree with you but I don’t think people who post that kind of posts you mention are tough at all.

There are toxic people being upset all around and being triggered because someone is defending their rights. I think we as a society should be more tolerant in general and stop dwelling in absolutes.

But that’s another issue. My point is that if the two choices are tough or vulnerable, give me a little bit of both depending on the situation. I wrote a personal example further up.

I didn’t say anything about cultural wars. I specifically avoided the issue in my example. Getting really upset because some wrote something is not a good thing for real life IMO, doesn’t matter who wrote what (provided it’s not news, of course). Part of a good society is the old adamant “I don’t agree with you at all but will defend your right to say it”.

We are constantly selling vulnerability as a gift, and I agree it’s important to be yourself and be able to show your emotions. what about people who know how to be vulnerable but not know how to be tough? Do you think that is healthy?

For instance (this happened to me) : you have a son and he breaks his arm, you are taking him to the hospital and he is crying and worried, he is only 8. You don’t know the extent of the injury, but it looks bad. You, as a parent, can calm him, even if you yourself are really scared. For me that is time to be tough. I can also show my vulnerability and tell the kid “I’m scared, I hope it is not anything serious” but in this case I find this showing of vulnerability a bit selfish, since you are adding to the kids angst.

As someone posted, being tough is not opposite of being vulnerable (that’s op’s fault, not mine) but if those are the options, sometimes it can be necessary to be tough.

By the way, I did cry once the kid was being taken cared of, and his sibling was with me in the car, and I explained to him that I was sad but confident everything would be ok.

I agree, but I also think there’s too much “vulnerable” nowadays. It’s important to be vulnerable, but it’s also important to be tough, mostly when there’s no big deal. “Some people on the internet are saying bad stuff and it triggered me and now my day is ruined…”

Pornlemmy, You say? I’ll be right back.

According to a new study published by the University of Berchul, eating ice cream can make you be in risk of drowning.