This is the only semi-legitimate reason I can get behind. For kids in grade-school.

If anybody outside of grade-school brings this up, I would laugh and ignore.

Condolences

Thanks. I’m stealing it.

FAFO?

This won’t work. Do you want more unmedicated people with guns?

People with mental health issues wouldn’t ever seek care if owning a firearm was linked to healthcare. Now we’re stigmatizing mental health treatment.

We want people to get care and be managed so they can live a normal life.

No wonder!

Now I feel dumb trying to press powder into my veins. I should have mixed it with water first, duh.

Time to donate some blood I guess. *sigh

Moist people don’t mind the occasional typo

Moist people don’t mind the occasional typo

Probably helped lower some risk, too.

Wasn’t there some controversy with who had the first flying machine? There was supposedly some guy in CT that flew an aircraft before the brothers?

EDIT - found this article Three states bicker over ‘first in flight’ claim

“how do they triforce?”

Your age, divided by 2, then add 7 = minimum age that most of society will deem okay.

For example:

25 ÷ 2 = 12.5 + 7 = 19.5

So the acceptable age for you to date that avoids the ‘ick’ is around 19 years old. Honestly it’s not a big deal in the long run.

For me as long as your above 18 and it’s consentual (ie. not forced, pressured, or groomed, etc), it’s fine.

Hey, that makes sense.

I was seeing “political” and misunderstanding it.

I believe it can work inwardly and be separate from politics. In reality, though, I don’t think it can.

I think the other Christians may have other issues that need resolving first if they believe that this is something that should be stopped or hindered.

Isn’t that the point of the calling someone a “minor”, though? Decision making capacity isn’t all there yet, higher chance of the stupid, believing you can fly, that sort of thing.

The article said he was aiming for the wall behind the mom. Maybe he thought he was some kind of ace combat special forces or something because of the VR headset stuff.

You’re missing the point. All I’m saying is that the punishment should fit the crime.

The kid is a kid. Not innocent, but not deserving of the full weight of adult punishment.

Worse yet, could the child be an undiagnosed ND? You and I don’t know. What if he is?

I agree, appropriate action should be taken. Just what exactly falls into that bucket though?

You can’t put an 11 year old in jail for man slaughter (I would call it that, not murder). Juvi? I really am not qualified enough to know my ass from a hole in the ground here.

What do you think?

A bad seed? Trim the bad ones for the sake of the future?

Would you put the neurodiverse into a gas chamber for being a burden on society, too?

My lord, you need some help.

This is a kid, it’s an accident, a tragic one. He’s going to need a psychiatrist his entire life. The punishment is he will live with it.