I could be wrong, but isn’t the “not annexing” because he doesn’t recognize it as a separate territory in the first place?

Call him any way you want, he can still hear you.

So what you’re saying is they think it’s sporing

Stability doesn’t mean “peace” it means “things don’t get worse.” And I think we both know that things could be A LOT worse.

IMO this is the real answer. Geopolitical stability in the region, at the cost of letting Israel do whatever it wants including genociding the Palestinians. It makes me sick, but I have a sinking feeling that if we allowed the entire region become unstable, that would make me sick as well.

“Quagmire” is a word for a reason.

And some that ran unopposed weren’t unopposed until they harassed and threatened their opposition into dropping out of the race.

He knows

I’m quite sure you don’t understand how it works.

Just setting up plausible deniability against accusations of helping trump.

it’s not like logical consistency matters to them.

In fact, fascists see the ability to just say whatever gets them the most power in the moment as a strength. They’re not held back by “weaknesses” like truth and facts

All that matters to them is power

Naturally it would be preposterous for him to be on the ticket for President, but the reason they continue to let him run for Congress is because he counts towards the Dems in terms of determining which party has the majority and therefore sets the agenda for that chamber of Congress. Without him, that particular part of WV would almost certainly go to the GOP and tip control of the Senate firmly in their favor.

It’s a deal with a devil, and one that has burned the Dems more than once. But without him we’d probably be completely fucked.

I’m not deluding myself about anything. The choice isn’t “vote for or against genocide” it’s “act to get less or more genocide”. It’s not a false dichotomy; if you’re not voting to defeat Trump, then you’re acting to get more genocide.

By not acting to defeat Trump, you’re enabling genocide more than Biden ever has.

“I’d rather let someone who actively, aggressively advocates, enables, and wants genocide domestically and abroad to win the presidency, over voting for somebody who passively enables genocide to happen abroad because actively trying to stop it could ignite WWIII” is still a bad take.

It’s baffling and hypocritical.

The thing is, police and politicians don’t care about getting correct results, they only care about results. An innocent person convicted is still “case closed” and “another criminal punished.”

Politicians can be made to care by threatening their jobs, but the police still don’t give a shit about catching the right person as long as they can put somebody behind bars by any means possible.

I’m their view, the experts are part of the problem and should be ignored.

He’s also said that he regrets a lot of that. 🤷🏻‍♀️

I think it’s important to note that the solution isn’t to not remove the dams, it’s to fucking nationalize the power companies.

Republicans will take away social security, blame Democrats, and their voters will believe them.

and not address the actual discussions.

Sorry, you lost me. What actual discussions are being ignored?

Gotcha. Very valid point.