Don’t they already have a stockpile from last time?
These people need to be banned from doing this lmao
Don’t they already have a stockpile from last time?
These people need to be banned from doing this lmao
Two words folks: Torment Nexus
4 rolls. Amateurs
Sorry, I think you need to brush up on statistics. The relevant measurement here would be the variance (Variation? Variability? Whatever the term is officially called) in the relevant statistic, not the size of the statistic itself. Using the variance and previous average of the deaths per capita statistic, you can calculate the likelihood of the current deaths per capita having this value compared to the past values. If that likelihood is sufficiently low (for most scientific fields, 5% or less), the result is declared significant, since it’s different than what we would expect it to be if nothing had changed, and we can say that with a high (>95%) confidence. To learn more about this “predict the chance of the result being within normal bounds and then go “whoa that’s weird” when it’s not” method, look up “null hypothesis”, or even better “statistical significance”.
To give a practical example: The number or deaths from car accidents is fairly low per capita, but since we have a very large amount of data available, it has a low variance and we can predict and calculate the ratio very accurately. If you look up a graph of car deaths per capita over time, each year will only have a ratio of like 0.001%, but the variance between years will not be very high, because we have so much data that the little bits of randomness all even out. We can then look at, for example, car deaths per capita for streets with crosswalks vs without crosswalks, and even though they’ll both be a fraction of a percent, because they’re both measured so accurately we can make confident assessments of that data.
Finally got some medical stuff sorted out. Also been working on my weight. I finished replayingg the original Kingdom Hearts on PS2 purely for my own enjoyment, which was fun, but I think that was last month.
Even if you were right and this were relevant, this would not be a statistical anomaly, it would be a methodology failure
Maybe you should try posting more often then ;)
Medic mains when their “useless” ubersaw crits for the 12th time in a row
I would classify it as “accurately identifying subtextual intentions”
“It’s not a feature, it’s a bug”
Your carrier pigeon is doing some serious work today
I get it. The world needs some hope again, it all feels so bleak right now.
Today’s Mission: That
Sometimes you just have to listen to the meme songs
Rockefeller Street Nightcore Remix
Oh, it’s not partisan? That’s… fine, yeah
Any church that does this should not get to be tax-free under the religious exemptions, because they’re also a political organization
Especially when it isn’t even using its vs it’s properly
I’m confused, are you asking to replace “you”/“your” with “it”/“its”? That’s the only pronoun there but I’ve never seen it be replaced and it’s not really gramatically equivalent.
TIL the scope of a conversation can never include anything that wasn’t in the original post. I can’t imagine how boring your conversations must be irl.
We need this for sure