Yeah, that’s what the comment you replied to starts with.
Yeah, that’s what the comment you replied to starts with.
Your comment makes sense in the frame of “ugly people are allowed to make music,” my comment refers to the “music was better” part of the post.
The ugly people you mentioned don’t support your comment’s argument against the original assertion because their music is terrible, not “better.”
Some music sucked in the boomer’s days, made by ugly and pretty people alike.
But the contention is about music being better, and that’s some bad music.
Dammit this whole post was an ad pack it up boys
The bootlicking version of “why do you need privacy if you have nothing to hide?”
If he was a tighter it’d be a different story
… that is there question.
Would you say what you’re seeking is “more intimacy,” up to, potentially, the most possible intimacy?
I would suggest looking at his different interests and getting curious. If you’re interested in the guy, it should be pretty easy to find reasons why this film or that game are endearingly-this-or-that in a way that makes you like and respect him even more.
Then, you bond over it; by trusting his taste (intimacy) enough to check out that show or whatever interest, you now have an opportunity to get deep (intimacy) into what you each individually felt (intimacy) about it, and maybe you felt something in common. That’s some foundation for intimacy.
I use tagging in Boost
We already went over it, I hit him so no refunds
Oh yeah well im bigly better at gulf than you
What? What? Fat chance, jack
etc.
this is true and I’m tired of pretending it isn’t
Lol bad take
But I’ve read they have since mitigated the traceability of their pizza eating through various means.
Yes, and I feel like the Republicans as you describe them would aptly be called “creepy.”
And I think “cringe” is often a feeling of second-hand embarrassment.
“Weird” and “strange” are more general and synonymous with “unusual” and “peculiar.”
None of that is in disagreement with your take, though
If only there was a way to get to the root of the problem.
Why did you reply to my comment to restate the first part of what I said?