I don’t know about all of you, I don’t like these new flat icons that everyone is using. What ever happened to the old icons, like on iPhone and Samsung they used to have them years ago. Those were good times. Now it is always these stupid boring cartoonish designed icons. Side note: Somebody please update this icon pack. I am trying to use it on xfce on arch but some of the icons aren’t working properly because it hasn’t been updated in a while. I’ll donate to you right away if you do it. Link to the repo: https://github.com/madmaxms/iconpack-obsidian

  • yum13241@lemm.ee
    2·
    3 days ago

    I use this icon pack. A very good GTK/Qt/Kvantum/whatever is Simplewaita. It goes together well with the icon pack.

  • monovergent 🏁@lemmy.ml
    11·
    6 days ago

    It’s nice and easy on the eyes. I conjecture that glossy and matte (as seen here) styles of skeuomorphism gave way to more abstract design since:

    • Skeuomorphism is hard to get just right without being excessive and tacky
    • Saturated, simple blocks of color pop out more, particularly on the increasingly prevalent mobile UI
    • And thus also have better shelf appeal

    If it were up to me, the red line would be when buttons and interactive elements are indistinguishable from text. The stock Android settings is probably among the worst offenders in this regard.

    What I really miss is light mode that isn’t hated for blinding users and dark mode that doesn’t plunge the user into the void. Those “toolbars” look lovely, perfect for any lighting condition or time of day. I’ve yet to understand why, at present, designers insist on pure white everywhere when it comes to light mode. Maybe everyone is using the night light filter so it doesn’t matter? At least pure black dark mode makes sense for power efficiency on OLEDs.

    • beleza pura@lemmy.eco.br
      4·
      6 days ago

      Skeuomorphism is hard to get just right without being excessive and tacky

      that was always my impression of os x back in the day. it felt tacky as hell. i’m a linux guy, but windows’s aero was so much more beautiful

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    2·
    4 days ago

    Skeuomorphic, IMHO, is the best thing that happened to the world of software. I don’t ever understand why the whole industry shifted to the ugly flat shit design.

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.worldEnglish
    172·
    7 days ago

    I miss UIs having lines and clear separations between elements. I loath this new flat style that everything has to have now, where you can’t tell when one thing stops and another starts.

    • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
      8·
      7 days ago

      And you can’t tell when something is active/focused or not because every goddamn app and web site wants to use its own “design language”. Wish I had a dollar for every time I saw two options, one light-gray and one dark-gray, with no way to know whether dark or light was supposed to mean “active”.

      I miss old-school Mac OS when consistency was king. But even Mac OS abandoned consistency about 25 years ago. I’d say the introduction of “brushed metal” was the beginning of the end, and IIRC that was late 90s. I am old and grumpy.

  • richardisaguy@lemmy.world
    121·
    7 days ago

    i don’t, not at all, but still think elementaryOS looks beautiful! Like holy hell, even on their websites they manage to make their design look good!

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      23·
      7 days ago

      If I understood it correctly, in this context it means that the icons normally retain the original logo and color scheme, while incorporating them into a single style.

      • lime!@feddit.nuEnglish
        34·
        7 days ago

        a skeuomorph (from greek, “tool/container-shape”) is something that retains the characteristics of another thing that it is based on, even though those characteristics are no longer useful. think lamps shaped like candles, or the floppy disk save icon, or media player programs with volume knobs.

        skeuomorphic UX is a good way to get users comfortable with a system by using designs they are already familiar with, and the original iphone used this to great effect.

        This is a good example of skeuomorphic UI: skeuomorph

        all to say, I’m not entirely sure these icons are skeuomorphs. they’re just glossy.

        • stellargmite@lemmy.world
          141·
          7 days ago

          Yeh the files being little pieces of paper, and the folders being old office folios are skeumorphic. Skeumorphic was (or is?) sometimes used more generically for ui elements made to look physical so perhaps the pseudo 3D shading, dropshadows, bevels and highlights qualify much of OPs examples, though they aren’t representing any specific type of physical object necessarily. Just objects to be grabbed and used (clicked).

          I’m sure trends will bring us back to a similar style at some point like they often do.

          • lime!@feddit.nuEnglish
            13·
            7 days ago

            it’s weird that. it’s obviously possible to have a flat-shaded skeuomorph, just look at basically all of windows 95, but for some reason we connect them to this particular graphical style. files and folders are both part of the old classic “desktop metaphor”, so they basically have to be skeuomorphs. but like, the application icons are basically just mosaic tiles of the normal icons.

            a proper skeuomorph would indicate what the program is for. krita and whatever map software that is are both good, if a little flat. but the libreoffice suite just being squares with a letter on them? have them be like, a spreadsheet for calc, a stack of cards for impress, and a printed page for write.

            remember all the icons for windows 95 network utilities that have people in them? those are also (attempts at) skeumorphs because they’re trying to communicate what the program does.

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          1·
          7 days ago

          Thanks! Learning more every day

          Also, beautiful design, and probably not bad for a touchscreen (terrible for mouse though)

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    91·
    7 days ago

    Yeah, I do miss that, but idk how much of it is nostalgia and how much is an absolute aesthetic preference. I think the main reason for the change though is Microsoft trying to make Windows work well on mobile devices though, meaning forgoing the aero and more expensive VFX.

    Wish some DEs would make their default style more like a win7 era style. Would be nice to have the variety.

  • m4m4m4m4@lemmy.world
    4·
    6 days ago

    I tried to do a couple of icon sets that went with that trend for KDE. At one point I was involved with the KDE VDG and was about to set the style of the icons they’d use.

    But apparently some suit told them they needed to go completely flat as they needed to plaster Firefox/distros/whatever logos on it, so everything needed to look consistent.

    So in the end I got bored about it and stepped away. I’m trying to redo a new square-shaped-skeumorphed icon set but it’s so much work - like it’d need to be your daily job to pull it off.

    However, if you take a look at it, it’s already in this one - some of them are just the base shape with some logo plastered on it (like the whatsapp one, or the one with the butterfly) and voilá, there’s your icon.

    So icon sets are incredibly hard, and if you want a skeumorphism icon set its hard squared. That’s another of the reasons flat icons thrive today.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    4·
    7 days ago

    My plasma 6 desktop has absolutely stunning icons, and im like you - I like proper icons that look more interesting.

    Try plasma 6, I’m sure those icon sets are also much more complete. :)

  • john89@lemmy.ca
    3·
    7 days ago

    I don’t know if you’d call that skeuomorphism, and we have icons that are similar.

    I’m not sure what you would call the opposite of ‘flat’ in terms of these designs, but I think that’s what you’re referring to.