Summary

Bernie Sanders criticizes the Democratic Party for neglecting the working class, leading to their recent election losses.

He highlights issues like economic inequality, job displacement, healthcare costs, and foreign policy as key concerns for the American people.

Sanders questions whether the Democratic leadership will address these issues or remain beholden to big money interests.

  • Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Man, if he’d form a populist left party and stop caucusing with the Dems, he might get a lot of enthusiastic support and candidates running locally soon

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      A third party, eh? Nah, he needs to take over the Democratic Party once and for all.

      • ramble81@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        He had momentum, the DNC, also run by our oligarchs denied him of the opportunity.

        • DancingBear@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Not for long

          Bernie kicks ass like a kung fu fighter

          Dems lost this election Bernie is still kicking and just won his seat back easy peasy

          Dude is an old motherfucker but kind of in the same way Samuel L Jackson is a bad motherfucker

        • nomous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          No there needs to be a place for “moderates” and embarrassed former-republicans to gather. The actual left can mobilize around Sanders and the current Republican party can die.

          • krashmo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            The party that just won full control of the government can die? If this doesn’t fall squarely in the wishful thinking category in your head then you are more delusional than Trump

      • karl_chungus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        We could also do this ourselves, if we could find a way to organize it.

        I’m sure with enough attention he’d acknowledge, and maybe support it.

        It may sound silly but what’s the alternative?

        • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I really think ranked choice voting is the answer here. It will open up the opportunity for third parties to actually gain traction.

          • karl_chungus@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Me too but how are we going to get that changed before the next election?

            Before ranked choice voting we need at least one party to rally around with a candidate that focuses on popular issues. Once we have someone in office that will commit to those issues we can then talk about these kinds of changes.

            A good place to start would be at the state level since states run their own elections. For that all I can suggest is to get more actively involved in local politics than you ever have before.

            Of course, that’s assuming we have another election.

            • seaQueue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Never underestimate the obstruction from establishment Democrats at every level of government. We passed a bill authorizing statewide use of ranked preference voting in CA and our neoliberal democrat governor Gavin Newsom vetoed it. I generally support his policies but this one was a flat out “fuck you” to everyone alienated by the neoliberal business as usual party that runs our state.

              • karl_chungus@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                4 hours ago

                The answer to obstruction at every level of government is to push back at every level of government then.

                That means getting involved in local government. You. Me. Us. All of us. Starting now.

            • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 hours ago

              That’s a good question. I think we need a massive push towards it, from our local officials all the way to the top. Bernie may get onboard.

              • karl_chungus@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 hours ago

                True but nothings going to happen until we both demand it and actually do something about it.

                The time to be hopeful that one of the major parties has an awakening is over.

                • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  Absolutely. I think that the best path of action is to let our local politicians know clearly that this is the desire of their constituents, and push hard to vote in candidates that support this. All of these politicians started somewhere, so the best hope for change starts locally and grows from there as word gets out.