• irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Millions? I don’t think so. There is no investment that would turn $30K or whatever into millions that was safe enough to work for the majority of people. But it would be a significant help.

    That being said, for most people, the amount you’d spend to live in a place where a car isn’t needed or constantly paying for ride share or taxis greatly exceeds the amount you’d save by not having a car for the vast majority of people, and that’s not even getting into the ableism issue.

    And sure we could get into buying a cheaper, used car or whatever, but in the long term the maintenance costs, having to buy another car sooner, and other financial risks to cars outside of warrantee over a lifetime will add up similarly unless you’re really lucky or can repair your own cars.

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      21 minutes ago

      and that’s not even getting into the ableism issue.

      Infrastructure that requires people to drive is far more ableist than the inverse. As many people with a disability can’t drive at all (or driving is a significant challenge).

      • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 hours ago

        S&P averaged about 10% over the last 30 years. That means it would be over 1.2 million.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      And sure we could get into buying a cheaper, used car or whatever, but in the long term the maintenance costs, having to buy another car sooner, and other financial risks to cars outside of warrantee over a lifetime will add up similarly unless you’re really lucky or can repair your own cars.

      Buying a low-mileage used car and even paying for a shop to do the maintenance is almost always cheaper than buying something with $500+ monthly payments. I don’t actually agree for the most part with Dave Ramsey (even about the entirety of this post)…but he’s correct that it is cheaper.

      • irotsoma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Most Americans have less than $1,000 in savings. So any car for that amount is not going to survive long. So most Americans still get loans for used cars.

        And with interest rates so high, a payment of $550 will only get you about $25K. That’s enough for a decent new small sedan, but if you have kids (especially if 3 or more), that’s probably the minimum needed to get a used minivan that will last a while.

        Anything else is only going to last a few years at best before needing major repairs.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          I just did an autotrader search and in my (very unaffordable) area, there were lots of serviceable cars under 10k. If you live in a place with a garage you can even buy a used EV and eliminate whole categories of maintenance costs.

          The whole point is to buy something that requires smaller or no monthly payments, and then bank the savings and eventually buy something better. “A couple of years” can do the trick in some cases.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      That being said, for most people, the amount you’d spend to live in a place where a car isn’t needed or constantly paying for ride share or taxis greatly exceeds the amount you’d save by not having a car for the vast majority of people, and that’s not even getting into the ableism issue.

      I disagree with everything else you say, as the other replies to you point out. But this is a really good point.