• TurtledUp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      You mean green bubble Chad’s? I hope they didn’t take away the green bubble it’s the only way people know you’re not in a cult.

      • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Aww are you sad it’s green too? Clearly you are uneducated. The green bubble appears when the message has to go through the SMS protocol. Messages from iPhone to iPhone can be green too.

        But don’t let me stop you from spreading your lies like a Christian.

    • Shouted@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      120
      ·
      7 months ago

      But you don’t understand. It’s Apple’s responsibility to make iMessage work across all platforms instead of users making informed decisions and using WhatsApp/FacebookMessenger/Whatever nth version of chat app Google is offering. /s

      Bunch toddlers demanding equal playtime with a toy they don’t own and then ranting to their mom, who instead of buying the toy for their kid, sues the neighbor to force them to let their kid play with the toy.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        76
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        SMS is hilariously insecure, and messaging is a critical piece of infrastructure. I’m shocked that the government has taken so long forcing Apple to play nicely with other platforms, considering international data security.

        • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          7 months ago

          What are you asking for? For iMessage to become the standard for messaging?

          It’s the telcos fault SMS sucks and it’s the telcos fault RCS is a joke unless you use Googles implementation on Android.

          • Pennomi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            69
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            7 months ago

            No, but API interoperability with literally anything else would be a damn good start. Right now Apple sues anyone who tries to make a bridge between iMessage and other standards.

            • generalpotato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              43
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Why? iMessage is a proprietary platform that Apple invested billions into. Expecting them to have API inter-op is idiotic. It’s not like you can’t text people outside of iMessage. There’s SMS, and people are free to use it. Expecting a “bridge” between two standards for the sake of having a bridge tells me people do not know how any of this works and are just parroting the same stupid arguments put forth by people that, again, do not understand how a technology is planned for, developed and maintained.

              If there’s such an appetite, ask the fucking government to set a standard and ask every smartphone operating in the country to comply. It’s really that simple.

              • iquanyin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                7 months ago

                upvoted for you last paragraph. bingo. and i’d love that. all the basic functions should be done to a standard, and a good one to boot. save time, money, and bullshit baby games on all sides.

              • Shouted@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                17
                ·
                7 months ago

                Don’t bother mate. Lemmy is a dumpster fire filled with angsty teenagers who hate their green bubble. It’ll be another couple decades before they understand how the world works.

                • generalpotato@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  True. I’m fine with the likes of Lemmy/Reddit users not getting it, but in this case, we have a DOJ that thinks this is somehow for them to solve. Law making via litigation is just lazy and moronic imo.

            • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              39
              ·
              7 months ago

              How would a third party client guarantee e2e encryption with iMessage?

              And by what mechanism was that company enabling that bridge? Did that mechanism store iCloud credentials? Did it encrypt the drives the users iCloud data could have been downloaded to? Did they have access to iMessages in clear text before forwarding them?

              • ferralcat@monyet.cc
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                29
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                The entire web is built on standardized e2e encryption schemes fought for by techie nerds so that we don’t have these problems there.

              • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                I’m not a programmer, but this doesn’t seem hard. The API could specify a cryptographic standard. Third party clients don’t need access to iCloud data, just the API to pass message and attachment content in encrypted form with a standardized handshake.

                What am I missing?

                • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  13
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  And what data would this client be handling via the API?

                  Even Signal discourages third party apps for this reason you are indeed missing.

                  • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Signal is open source. That’s why they warn against using third party closed source apps which cannot be security audited.

                    iMessage is a proprietary app that cannot be security audited. An open source alternative would be more secure, not less.

          • Shouted@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            7 months ago

            People forget the state of SMS before Apple decided to tell telcos to go fuck themselves and rolled out iMessage.

            Americans would still be paying per-text message without Apple.

            • gorgori@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              All fine and dandy. Kudos to Apple for the innovation! But then they decided to keep it strictly inside Apple.

              That’s not how communication works. Imagine if Bell kept the telephone to themselves… Oh wait… They tried… Got sued for it… Company broke up and the whole world got interoperable telephone system that is alive to this day.

              Innovation is great, capitalizing on innovation is also great. But eventually it needs to reach everyone and the answer cannot be “then everyone should buy Apple”.

              Imagine if DARPA kept the Internet as “Americans only”

              • Shouted@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                7 months ago

                So you’re saying iPhones are as important to humanity as the internet and should be equally regulated as such?

                • gorgori@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  You missed the entire point. Typical Apple fanboy.

                  The iphone isn’t at all important to humanity and that’s why it should be regulated. Especially when something so unimportant gets such a large market dominance.

                  Anyone should be able to buy anything and expect things to be interoperable.

                  I like the airpods. They don’t work properly on android. Why?

                  They could easily license out the tech and other companies will pay billions for it. and Apple will get their ROI.

                  Intel was forced to license x86.

                  Face it. Apple’s behavior is visibly monopolistic. It wouldn’t have landed on DOJ’s desk if there were no good reason.

        • Shouted@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          Nothing is stopping people from downloading whatever chat app they want to use. EU has done that.

          • nymwit@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            7 months ago

            Something is stopping another messaging app to have sms fallback and be the default messaging app on iOS. It’s iOS.

            • Shouted@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              7 months ago

              But does it work? Can you, as an Android user, send text messages to and from people with iPhones?

          • Pennomi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’m saying this is a national security issue. The government has a vested interest in killing off SMS as soon as possible.

        • generalpotato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          27
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          SMS works. iMessage works. Both work in tandem on a device and there’s a distinction which is which, therefore you get full access to and from when communicating with a device. I’m shocked that there’s this lunacy around conflating the two or expecting two different standards to work because people want to.

          I want to have flying cars and breathe underwater without any equipment next, guess lets file a lawsuit forcing sub makers and car makers to go make that happen.

          • Shouted@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Ah, I see a comment with downvotes here and I know it’s a rational one I should be paying attention to.

            Things work, but they feel entitled to forcing Apple to dedicate their resources to offering the same experience to people who don’t do business with Apple.

            Forcing a business to operate better with another competitor for no benefit of their own is a dangerous precedent to set.