• Pasta4u@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    112
    ·
    1 year ago

    I went to a public high school where boys had to wear long pants all year round. We didn’t have air conditioners. Meanwhile girls would wear skirts.

    So stop woth the sexism.

    Public schools should just have uniforms of a polo shirt and slacks , shorts or knee high skirts and that is it.

    It will help also woth poor kids not having to be made fun of when some people come in with Gucci purses amd expensive shit.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sounds like the dress code hurts boys as well. The solution is still to reform.

      I’ve heard of male students wearing skirts in protest and that normally works with the Puritan school administrators.

      • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes we wore kilts to protest and the. A few years later they did the same thing woth walk outside and. A heat wave putting finals in a 100 degree weather and they changed it.

        Uniforms is what works. It prevents bullying

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m having a hard time parsing out your liberal interpretation of grammar.

          Uniforms is what works. It prevents bullying

          So does actually enforcing anti-bullying laws, but that would take effort by the teachers.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes and teacher effort is a limited resource which is why these rules should be considered based on their simplicity. A dress code is simpler than anti-bullying rules to enforce.

          • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Children and teenagers can’t be watched 24/7 and with larger class sizes it’s very hard to catch all bullying.

            But you already know thay.

            • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ve had it happen repeatedly in plain view of the teacher during class. But I guess you never experienced that. Must be nice.

              • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You shouldn’t assume what others have gone through. You just look like an ass when you do

    • EsheLynn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who purchases the uniforms? You mentioned impoverished kids being made fun of, but the parents have to buy the expensive, overinflated uniforms as well. Wouldn’t that put more strain on less well off families, having to buy specific clothes for their child’s attendance, each year for each child?

      • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m generally not in favor of uniforms, but this argument really goes both ways: who purchases (potentially very expensive brand) clothes in a school setting where the expectation is that kids constantly wear nice, new clothes to school? Even assuming that bullying or mobbing based on clothes isn’t an issue, the cost to keep buying outfits could easily be higher than the cost of uniforms.

        That said, I’ve known problematic settings only by proxy. At my school, nobody gave a fuck about what students were wearing, there was no dress code, and I would have absolutely hated being forced to wear a uniform.

          • ToxicWaste@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            But that is just regulation for regulations sake. Since you can buy the cheap walmart stuff or an expensive italian designer - it really does not fulfill the only supposed benefit of stopping bullying.

      • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        No. It was just single colored shirt and pants. We got wal mart shirts for the dress code. They’ll still fuck with you for your shoes.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The parents do. We have to purchase school supplies and get nickeled and dimed for PTO stuff and field trips plus the school lunches.

        Imagine if we expected soldiers to buy their rifle, pay for their meals, pay for their uniforms, imagine the outcry about troop readiness. Why do we tolerate it with education?

        • atrielienz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Crazily enough we do to some extent. They issue you a bunch of stuff in boot camp. It comes out of your pay.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s sorta the same but not, the government knows the money is there they are just doing funny accounting. When the school sends me a notice that one of my kids needs something they have no idea what my financial situation is. This matters. Soldiers can concentrate on learning how to do their thing, students are distracted by demands to figure out how to buy something.

    • dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I disagree completely. Uniforms have been proven to not help with anything they claim to. For one, they generally can’t be bought second hand.

      • jasondj@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Dude if you’re a parent with a friend group of other parents in your school district, there will absolutely be hand-me-downs going all over the damn place.

        My kids have so many clothes that they’ve never worn because we just keep passing clothes around, between their friends and cousins, everyone is growing so fast, it’s foolish to be spending a ton of money on brand new clothes unless we need something for a specific special occasion.

        I’m sure school uniforms, as long as they are consistent, would be swapped around. I’m sure there would be parent groups forming on Nextdoor and Facebook to swap clothes. And I’m sure they would show up at the thrift stores.

        Secondhand uniforms would not be a problem.

        But honestly the most important part is that schools don’t treat it as a fundraiser. They should be able to buy in bulk and coordinate with neighboring districts on selection to maximize discounts, and sell at slightly above cost in order to offset free/reduced cost outfits for low income families.

        In other words, in theory, it should be less expensive to dress your kids in school uniform.

        Personally I think uniforms solve a lot more problems than they cause. They sacrifice a bit of self-expression (at least the older kids, who mostly dress and style themselves), but at the same time, it takes a big hit out of financial inequality bullying. Combined with universal lunch programs it basically destroys it.

        That in itself is worth it. Kids getting bullied (or feeling empowered, for that matter) for things 100% out of their control (like the caste they’re born into) shouldn’t be a thing.

        • Smoogs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Private schools are not public schools. Impoverished cannot afford private schools. And Uniforms are not interchangeable.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hey here is an idea. School uniform companies should make it so they have to change it every year like textbook makers do. All it will take to convince the school is telling them that the old uniforms were end-of-lifed and a campaign donation to the school board reps. Parents will be offered a 5% discount if they mail back their old clothing. The clothing will interlock together so you can’t mix last year’s shirt with this year’s pants without it being super noticeable. Which will kill the secondary market.

            CaaS, clothing as a service. You will own nothing and be happy.

            Brb getting turtleneck on, because I am a visionary now.

          • jimbolauski@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ed choice has enabled many kids to attend private schools, tutition is actually less than the cost per pupil that that public schools cost.

            • Smoogs@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Wtf is Ed choice. Oh. another ‘only American’/scholarship-rewarding-elites thing again. You’re using ‘many’ very liberally.

              • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                A way to divert money from public sector to scumbags in private sector who won’t follow any of the government regulations or take underperforming students.

                Private schools can fire someone for being LGBT, public schools can’t. Private schools can share private medical information with parents (like being LGBT) or seeking birth control, public can’t except under very regulated conditions. Private schools can get out of teaching evolution and sex ed, public schools can’t. The list goes on and on. Public funding of private schools breaks a century of progress. We are going to see a brave new world with football couches and school admins making millions while teachers are making daycare worker salaries teaching from books based on a prot understanding of the bible.

                • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What you said sounded wrong, so I asked the AI about it. I know the AI is wrong sometimes, but doesn’t this seem more like the truth than what you said about private schools firing people for being LGBT?

                  In the United States, federal law protects employees from discrimination based on their sexuality. The Supreme Court ruled in June 2020 that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination based on sex, also covers sexual orientation and gender identity. Therefore, it is illegal to fire someone for being gay.

        • EsheLynn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you are going to a private school, it’s kinda implied money isn’t a huge issue anyways. Your parents are paying for you to attend this exclusive school, after all.

          But you can’t take Johnson Academy’s uniform to Brentwood. So, if Brentwood isn’t having a sale, what then?

          • jimbolauski@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ed choice has enabled many kids to attend private schools.

            Kids grow and their uniforms don’t fit, giving them to the school to resell as a fundraiser or giving them directly to other students is common. On top of that most private schools do not have embroidered cressents on their uniforms so they can be used interchangeably. Private schools are different than what you see on TV.

            • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes clearly that is exactly what I fucking asked about since it has 0% to do with the claim you made. That makes so so much sense.

              Really putting that private school education to work today.

              • jimbolauski@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m going to need you to put your big boy thinking cap on for a second. What do you think happens to uniforms that kids grow out of?

                • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  And I want a fucking citation that every single private school on earth has a second hand shop affiliated with it.

                  Guess critical thinking isn’t taught at private school

                  • jimbolauski@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    If you understood critical thinking at all you would know what you are asking for is impossible. What I’m trying to figure out is if you are too dumb to know that, too dumb to realize your gotcha is not one, or both.

                    Let’s look at my statement “private schools have used uniform sales”. The question you an intelligent person would ask is at what point does the number of schools that do not have used uniform sales invalidate that statement. Not even the biggest mouth breather would claim that only one school that does not offer a used uniform sale invalidates the statement, they would be adept enough to notice that the word all is missing.

      • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Poor kids still need clothes. But if you have a uniform you only need a few shirts and pants and they are all the same so no.one will know if you only have three sets of the uniform.

        If you need to wear a different outfit every day to.school you would need at least five completely different outfits and to be oerfectly honest at least 10 so you wouldn’t repeat often enough for people to notice younare wearing the same outfits all the time.

        Uniforms actually reduce costs for.poor students and reduce bullying.

        But of course run your mouth with nonsense cause it sounds smart.

        • optissima@possumpat.io
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was one of those poor kids, so I remember being price gouged every year when I no longer fit my clothing. I also remember switching to a school that didn’t, and suddenly it was less expensive because, unlike your implication, I didn’t run around naked outside of my uniform when not in school, and wore the same clothing in and out. I also remember doing research and citing sources for my claims, which you seem to be short on. Maybe it’s because you’re not wearing your uniform right now? Can you provide a source for any of your claims?

    • luky@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      not agreeing. i would want to wear my clothes. just casual, nothing gucci or else. the school should offer uniforms but without forcing studemts to wear it. something like an advertisement.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The whole point of removing the choice is to remove the signals that the choices send. Making the uniform an option goes against the definition of “uniform”.

        One option. Everyone the same. That’s what “uniform” means.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah this is all wrong

      1. It won’t be clothing can just get at Walmart, is practical, and comfortable. It will be polyester Landsend shit that is too expensive, rips easily, takes weeks to get there, and feels like steel wool on your skin. Meanwhile teachers and admins will continue to wear what they want.

      2. It won’t promote equality since the poor kids will just have ripped up stuff and the rich kids will load up on the accessories

      3. Fucking deal with it. You should be able to handle not having the best clothing in life. I did.

      My school tried a uniform for a few years and I have never once forgave them for that. I won’t allow my kids to be punished the same way. Also someone found their old uniform in the attic many years later, shredded it with a knife, and mailed it to their former principal with a note that told them that’s what I think of your messed up uniform policy you forced on us.

      • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You aren’t well informed and just are going off your own personal experience.

        I worked for a school district that implemented school uniforms after a kid attempted suicide for bullying.

        The dress code required polo shirts from multiple companies including target, Walmart, Costco house brands and slacks or black jeans with no rips. Bullying drastically dropped across schools in the district (there were 9 schools)

    • Kage520@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re getting down voted but as someone who had exactly 3 shirts and 2 pair of shorts in high school, I would have vastly preferred a uniform mandate. My mom had enough money she just didn’t see extra clothes as a necessary expense for her. She would have been forced to get the uniforms and I would have had an easier time in high school.

      People are also saying that’s an unnecessary expense for the poor people, but why can the school afford the building, the teachers, administration, etc, but not 5 pairs of clothes for the students? Maybe even for need based students?

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        why can the school afford the building, the teachers, administration, etc, but not 5 pairs of clothes for the students

        Even in public schools, parents have to pay for the gym uniform. Books too.